DxO PhotoLab for RAW Workflow

Good Gear

The Photography Blog

Photographic Field Guides
Practical Philosophies
Careers and Ideas
Inspiring Journeys

DxO PhotoLab for RAW Workflow
DxO PhotoLab is a genuine alternative to Lightroom and Capture One, delivering excellent value and professional features. It's not as polished or featured as Capture One, but it's worth a look if you want something lighter for your RAW workflow, plus support for a wider range of cameras and lenses.

The Photography Blog


Lightroom and Capture One get most of the attention when shopping for RAW Workflow software, but in recent years both have moved towards subscriber only pricing. After an appalling lack of camera support from Capture One in 2022 I started looking seriously at my alternatives. I’ve been a Capture One fan since the early days. No really, the very very early days. We’re talking more than two decades ago when version 3 hit the internet and Lightroom didn’t even exist yet. Back then Aperture on MacOS was the main alternative, or you had to pull images through one by one in Photoshop. Capture One was a clear winner back then. Today there are tonnes of options on the market, admittedly most of them "not quite right".

DxO PhotoLabs is feature rich and quick to learn. What’s on offer is a lot of good technology, a half decent user interface and some simple pricing advantages. It also plays nicely with LUMIX cameras – but more on that later. The defaults tend to be a little heavy handed for my style, and need dialling back for practical use. But it does deliver professional results. Once you get control of the sheer variety of tools on offer, DxO starts to look like a genuine alternative to Capture One or Lightroom.


DxO PhotoLab ditches the catalogues and libraries, in favour of more simplified editing. You point the software at your folder of RAW files and it builds a quick and dirty index of the contents, which are stored locally on your machine. When you edit a file those changes are stored into a local file next to your RAW file, making it easy to take your work from one computer and move to another.

The range of manipulation tools available are impressive. At times the interface is cluttered with options that I don’t really care about, especially the automated features that try to make your image jump off the page with the click of a button. There's room to simplify the tool range in my view – even the noise reduction interface offers four different engines to choose from. There’s a touch too much marketing in play here, with fancy names for various “modules” and the option to upgrade to the “elite” version where all the best modules are already loaded. I wish they just put the stuff that works into a single edition and stop with the malarkey.

Some of the tools are very heavy handed, and indeed the default settings were too pimped up for my tastes. Too much contrast, too much sharpening and too much vibrance. I created my own set of defaults, which DxO let you set in the preferences. This means when I open a new folder of RAW files I can have my personal style of defaults applied right out of the gate. Nice.


The power tools for me when using Capture One were its superior application of healing brushes, and the ability to create layers and masks to seriously fine tune an image. DxO keeps up with Capture One’s functionality very nicely. Version 6 of DxO PhotoLabs now has a keystone tool as well, which was something I struggled to live without for the precise nature of our studio work.

Things such as dropping in a gradient to pull back dynamic range in the sky, or brushing in a layer across a subjects face to lift the highlights, are easy to complete in DxO PhotoLabs. Some things are clunky compared to Capture One, such as the extra keystroke required to output a final image, but switching between programs is always going to require relearning some keystrokes and looking for tools in menus. Unlike Capture One, which is built around layers for adjustments or masks, DxO PhotoLabs hides away the various layers in the "Local Adjustments" tab and employs some quirky floating menus to access the tweakable options.

For the most part the interface is intuitive, and the tools do what you want them to do. Capture One still offers more latitude to push some of its tools, with a view to being creative rather than “accurate”. DxO are all about fidelity of the image and perhaps have missed the opportunity to appeal to photographers who want an artistic expression rather than lens corrections.


There’s no advanced tools for Panoramas or HDR in the current version of DxO PhotoLab. Ironically, these were features Capture One introduced before they updated their support for certain LUMIX cameras which means I never upgraded my license and never got to try. I use Affinity Photo for such things in any case, a marvellous alternative to Photoshop that is incredibly well priced and does not require a subscription. Tethering support is not a feature of DxO PhotoLabs either, but that too was problematic in Capture One.

The modest set of features offered in DxO PhotoLab is not a big deal for me. The basics work well and deliver excellent results for a wide range of situations. While they like to talk up their noise reduction algorithm I will say that Capture One has an advantage there. A real annoyance with DxO PhotoLab is a select few tools which are not enabled in the “Elite” version, the most expensive release available. Things like Split Toning are disabled unless you buy the Film Pack, which means your options for custom monochrome conversions or DIY creative presets are very very basic indeed.

Support for lenses and cameras is the main advantage for DxO. When you load in RAW files with a new camera or a different lens it hasn’t seen before, the software checks the DxO website and automatically pulls down any modules that support your hardware. That means that you don’t need to upgrade the entire package, just to upgrade your camera. That’s a major advantage for a RAW workflow package without monthly fees.


ON1 Photo RAW is heavily focused on AI powered editing, going far beyond simply processing your RAW files. Limited support for LUMIX models (Still waiting on GH6 support) and tethering restricted to Canon and Nikon. Pricing is very confusing with subscription and standalone options available, plus separate billing for different modules.

Darktable is the open source alternative to Lightroom, which mimics the Lightroom vibe in many ways while offering more geeky controls over your RAW files. It runs on Linux, Windows and Max, and offers a lot more functionality than you might expect from an open source project. GH6 Support not available as of Jan 2023.

SilkyPix is another longstanding RAW processing tool that is popular in some markets. It leans on the geeky side even more than DxO, evoking a strong “shareware” vibe despite its commercial underpinnings.


I first gave DxO PhotoLabs a look when I started shooting with the LUMIX GH6. Even though the model had been in stores for over 6 months at the time, Capture One still had no support for the GH6 RAW files. Each month they would say support was "coming soon” and each month a new round of angry comments would land on the forums. This was especially frustrating for LUMIX owners who were paying a monthly subscription to access Capture One.

The other good news from DxO is they do support the "hires" mode on LUMIX cameras, so those 100MP images off the GH5 or S5 will play nicely in the DxO PhotoLab interface.

Meanwhile there's a new camera in town from Panasonic, the LUMIX S5II is so new that, as of January 2023, DxO PhotoLabs 6 doesn’t have a dedicated module to support the camera. No problem though, I was able to use “exiftool” on my Mac and run a simple command that updates all the RAW files in a folder to mimic the older LUMIX S5. The cameras share a very similar sensor output, and DxO recognises the images off the new LUMIX S5II very nicely once the model name has been updated. I tested the same exif-hack on a variety of other RAW editors (Photoshop, Lightroom, Capture One, ON1, Darktable, Affinity Photo) with no success. Only DxO played nice at this point in time.

>> exiftool *.RW2 -Model="DC-S5"


As for my old friend Capture One, their lack of support for LUMIX when it comes to tethering or basic RAW files feels like the old days when Phase One decided they would stop playing nicely with Hasselblad or the Pentax 645Z. For me it undermines my trust in the company. Even if they support my camera today, will that stop tomorrow? I’ve raised the LUMIX support issues with Capture One on their support forums, and let’s just say their official responses have been underwhelming.

Please Share Your Thoughts


This feature was last updated on Monday 02nd January 2023

Copyright: All images and words on this web site are copyrighted and may not be used without permission.
Article published and written by

Related Links
  global  Good Gear  RAW Workflow  DxO PhotoLab  Exiftool

Very selected features on the hardware, software and extra wares that help me get the job done.

SD Cards Explained

Shopping for an SD card is frustratingly hard, with so many brands, standards and price points to navigate through. Especially when speed is a necessity rather than a luxury. It's also possible that the best value SD card is a MicroSD card, if you have the right adaptor.

The Worlds Worst Menu System

I'm astounded that Sony have released a camera that is so darned good, yet crippled by a user interface so completely awful. The ZV-E1 is hard enough for a seasoned professional to tame, but a potential road block to be avoided for anyone just starting their journey into photography.

Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD

I travelled in the Himalayas for a few months in late 2023 with this lovely lens. If you're interested in more than just tech specs, and what it's like to work with this lens for an extended time then you've come to the right place.

20mm is the new 24mm

20mm is now far more common than ever for both primes and zooms, but is 18mm the better option for photographers? And why even bother with 24mm? When shooting wider than wide does it make a difference to buy an extra few mm of perspective?

Tamron Got It Covered

The Tamron 20-40mm F2.8 and 35-150mm F2-2.8 narrow the gap between primes and zoom. I didn't think I'd like these new lenses from Tamron so much, but the fact is every time I took them out to shoot I ended up with a tonne of great images. That’s a little bit annoying for a prime lens snob like myself.

My Favie Magnetic Filter

From the studio to the harsh sunlight of Australia's North-West, I dragged my little pouch of magnetic ND filters around the country to find out which system works best. And found myself a new best friend in OKKO.

Ewen's Photography Book

"ReIMAGINE" is now available to order online.
It's a very big and very generous book that will help you to reconnect with your creative side.


Stay Inspired
Join Ewen's newsletter for short updates on new articles and photographic inspiration.

Thanks, you are now subscribed. Please check your inbox for a welcome email.

Computer says NO.
Please check the email address.